A story of love, betrayal and impending war became entwined with upheavals that affect the discipline of folklore to this day.
In the decades before WWII, Carl Wilhelm von Sydow (1878-1952) emerged as a formidable theoretician. A traditionalist anchored in nineteenth-century Romanticism, his roots reached back to Jacob Grimm and the quest to link folktales to older, idealised times. Folklorists were preoccupied with how oral tradition changed over centuries, to arrive at imagined original tales. Finnish scholars led in organizing and analysing folktale variants being collected internationally, but von Sydow was determined to forge his own way.
In the mid-1920s, a student devoted to scientific Positivism challenged von Sydow. Sven S. Liljeblad (1899-2000) studied under von Sydow at Lund University in southern Sweden. Liljeblad looked to Franz Boas (1858-1942), a German and fellow Positivist, who was engaged in meticulously gathering the traditions and material culture of Native Americans to describe geographic patterns. With this example, von Sydow and Liljeblad abandoned intuitive-based Romanticism, developing the Oicotype Method to understand how environment and culture affect diffusing traditions.
To debut this idea, Liljeblad wrote a treatise on the ‘Grateful Dead’ motif: a hero sees a corpse on the roadside; people scorn the remains because the man was reviled; taking pity, the hero buries the corpse; the man’s spirit dedicates itself to the hero as the Grateful Dead. Folklorist Jan-Öjvind Swahn, a fellow student of von Sydow, describes this as ‘the first real bomb under the far too mechanical methodology of the Finnish School’ (Bringéus 140).
Growing in repute, von Sydow attracted many students. These included Elisabeth Hartmann (1912-2005) who came from Germany in 1933. Upon arriving, she met von Sydow’s ‘little son … about 4, playing in a heap of sand.’ She described how she had often put him to bed, reading Grimm’s fairy tales translated into Swedish. Hartmann was ‘adopted into the family as a ‘“niece”, … a frequent guest in their lovely little home.’
Hartmann studied troll traditions, directed by von Sydow and Liljeblad, now also lecturing at Lund. Her dissertation became a cornerstone to understanding troll-related beliefs. Her comparison of Celtic fairies reflects how von Sydow and Liljeblad saw the Celtic fringe as pivotal to Northern European folklore.
In 1935, von Sydow hosted an International Folk-Tale Congress. Liljeblad and Hartmann attended as did many of the day’s great luminaries, among whom was Stith Thompson who offered Hartmann employment with his Motif Index project in Bloomington, Indiana. It was an invitation she regretted rejecting, for her life could have unfolded very differently.
Hartman described increasingly close feelings for Liljeblad, inspiring ‘good “uncle Wilhelm” … to begin to fear for a “tragedy”, which to avoid must be his duty. Both of us were told in private, that “Sven will never be able to marry!”’ She heard how the great Swedish explorer, Sven Hedin, invited young scholars, including Liljeblad, to go on his final expedition to Asia in 1927. With borrowed money, Liljeblad purchased equipment for himself and a friend, who would repay half the loan. The friend sold everything and disappeared, leaving Liljeblad destitute and unable to undertake the journey. Again, Hartmann wrote, ‘we remained friends. We used to meet [and] were always glad together, though often “starving”, both of us lacking the money for a restaurant-meal.’ Hartmann later confessed that Liljeblad was her only true love.
The stage was set for a split between Liljeblad and von Sydow. Interference into the lives of students was one thing, but von Sydow’s admiration for Nazis was another. He strived to elevate Scandinavia while sympathizing with Germany’s plight after the Great War. In 1937, von Sydow joined the National Swedish-German Association, a pro-Hitler group.
Liljeblad condemned Nazi cruelty, and as a communist his politics were antithetical to his mentor. From Copenhagen, he began bribing officials to rescue academics and Jews caught in the Nazi web. By the end of the decade, Liljeblad was a ‘marked man’. It was flight or death once war began in September 1939. Securing funding for work in both Afghanistan and the United States, he chose the latter.
Launching a significant second career, Liljeblad documented Northern Paiute and Shoshone languages and traditions. In 1949, he married fellow Swede, Astrid von Heijne. King Gustaf VI Adolf of Sweden wrote saying all was forgiven, asking Liljeblad to come home. Liljeblad responded that he would not return, having enough royalty among Paiute and Shoshone friends. His wife, however, advocated repatriation, which she secured after her husband turned 90. Liljeblad survived another decade in Sweden, receiving numerous honours. He died before his 101st birthday.
Von Sydow, angered by Germany’s invasion of Denmark and Norway, resigned from the National Swedish-German Association on 9 April 1940. While he continued his illustrious career, his legacy retains the taint of the 1930s. Although his Oicotype Method remains influential, it is now applied less rigorously than he imagined. Liljeblad and his mentor resumed correspondence, but they never met again. Von Sydow died in 1952. His son, the boy Hartmann babysat for several years, became the famous actor ‘Max’ von Sydow.
Hartmann, parting with Liljeblad in 1938, was summoned home. Under virtual house arrest for opposing Hitler, she was protected by a Nazi father who despised his ‘traitorous’ daughter. A brief marriage ended in a 1944 divorce, a disaster that nevertheless granted her a son and daughter, sunshine for subsequent decades. After the war, Hartmann ironically faced scorn as the daughter of a Nazi. Eventually, a single student, Lutz Röhrich, came for mentoring. A source of pride for Hartmann, Röhrich became an acclaimed scholar.
Liljeblad assumed Hartmann died during the war: bearing a married name, she seemingly vanished. With the long shadows of dusk, the two re-established contact of sorts in 1996. As Astrid Liljeblad explained, they ‘received a very charming poem [from Hartmann], telling how happy she was to know that Sven was alive and with witty reminiscings about the past. Sven planned to write her, but it never happened. [He] never really explained more than saying that the author had been a former student of his.’
Hartmann subsequently corresponded with Astrid Liljeblad and me, Sven’s student. In dozens of letters, she voiced gratitude that her mentor thought highly of her scholarship. Hartmann advised me regarding converting her dissertation into a modernized treatment of trolls, appreciating the continued respect of her work. She died in 2005. Astrid Liljeblad, like her husband, lived to be nearly 101, dying in 2010.
Once, while studying under Liljeblad between 1976 and 1981, I asked if he knew about the band called the Grateful Dead. ‘No’, he replied with his rumbling Swedish accent. ‘What does it mean?’ Because I had no answer, Rock and Roll dominated our discussion for the day.
The Folklore of Cornwall by Ronald M. James
Ronald M. James’ latest book, The Folklore of Cornwall, has just been released,
and is now available from The University of Exeter Press.
“By considering the folklore of Cornwall in a Northern European context, this book casts light on a treasury of often-ignored traditions. Folklore studies internationally have long considered Celtic material, but scholars have tended to overlook Cornwall’s collections. The Folklore of Cornwall fills this gap, placing neglected stories on a par with those from other regions where Celtic languages have deep roots. The Folklore of Cornwall demonstrates that Cornwall has a distinct body of oral tradition, even when examining legends and folktales that also appear elsewhere. The way in which Cornish droll tellers achieved this unique pattern is remarkable; with the publication of this book, it becomes possible for folklorists to look to the peninsula beyond the River Tamar for insight. A very readable text with popular appeal, this book serves as an introduction to folklore studies for the novice while also offering an alternative means to consider Cornish studies for advanced scholars. The comparative analysis combined with an innovative method of The Folklore of Cornwall is not to be found in other treatments of the subject.”
Recommended Books from #FolkloreThursday
References and Further Reading
Nils-Arvid Bringéus, Carl Wilhelm von Sydow: A Swedish Pioneer in Folklore (Helsinki: FF Communications No. 298, 2009).
Elisabeth [Hofelich] Hartmann, Die Trollvorstellungen in den Sagen und Märchen der Skandinavischen Völker (Tübingen: Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, 1936).
Ronald M James, ‘Sven Samuel Liljeblad’, Halcyon: A Journal of the Humanities (1980).
———, Collected correspondence of Sven Liljeblad (1981-1997), Astrid Lijeblad (1990-2010), and Elisabeth Hofelich-Hartmann (1998-2005): abridged transcription on file with the Liljeblad Collection, Special Collections Library, University of Nevada, Reno.
Sven S Liljeblad, Die Tobiageschichte und andere Märchen mit Toten Helfern (Lund: Lindstedts, 1927).
Carl Wilhelm von Sydow, ‘Geography and Folk-Tale Oicotypes’, Béaloideas, 4:3 (1934), pp. 344–55, reprinted in von Sydow, Selected Papers on Folklore.
———-, Selected Papers on Folklore, Laurits Bødker, editor (Copenhagen: Rosenkilde and Bagger, 1948).
Latest posts by Ronald M. James (see all)
- Horse or Dragon? May Day’s ‘Obby ‘Oss of Padstow, Cornwall - April 25, 2019
- Nazis, Trolls and the Grateful Dead: Turmoil among Sweden’s Folklorists - April 11, 2019
- Piskies, Knockers and Tommyknockers – Cornwall’s Misunderstood Folklore - January 10, 2019